against placing mobile antenna tower are completely right,
their fears of radiation that comes from the mobile antenna
towers are well grounded. Because this nonionizing radiation
damages health, following the facts published by EMRRA
/ Electromagnetic Radiation Alliance of Australia /.
Very small density of
radiation of 0.0004 micro watts per
square cm disrupts normal function of the brain which is
manifested by sleep disturbance, the possibility of damages
memory, and thus ability of learning, and lowers the immune system.
What is the radiation higher, the damage is worser and
more fatal.
Some 7 m distance from the source of such a radiation does not
square cm disrupts normal function of the brain which is
manifested by sleep disturbance, the possibility of damages
memory, and thus ability of learning, and lowers the immune system.
What is the radiation higher, the damage is worser and
more fatal.
Some 7 m distance from the source of such a radiation does not
protects no one,
indeed, the strongest radiation faro
is in the zone 30 m distance from the tower, depending on the type and
capacity of transmitter. The transmitter tower and all
space around it has the strongest the radiation intensity and is described
In the literature as "inaccesible".
is in the zone 30 m distance from the tower, depending on the type and
capacity of transmitter. The transmitter tower and all
space around it has the strongest the radiation intensity and is described
In the literature as "inaccesible".
Electromagnetic
radiation of the working towers deals with frequencies
that causes brain tumors, lymphomas,
memory and concentration problems, changes the pattern
brain, alters cell proliferation tissue,
causes chemical mutation of the blood, breaks blood brain barrier
which leads to premature Alzheimer's and
Parkinson's disease, etc. ...
that causes brain tumors, lymphomas,
memory and concentration problems, changes the pattern
brain, alters cell proliferation tissue,
causes chemical mutation of the blood, breaks blood brain barrier
which leads to premature Alzheimer's and
Parkinson's disease, etc. ...
The organs that
contain
more waters and liquids are more endangered / bones are less than
eyes / problem causes not only the strength of the transmitter,
but ts frequency that can damage tissue.
more waters and liquids are more endangered / bones are less than
eyes / problem causes not only the strength of the transmitter,
but ts frequency that can damage tissue.
Most affected are
fetuses and babies, children, youth and
adults. Age limit does not provides a protection,
but quantity of radiation measured by SAR units that actually mean
the amount of radiation received per kilogram of body
weight. What the body weight is the smaller, a child is younger, smaller,
adults. Age limit does not provides a protection,
but quantity of radiation measured by SAR units that actually mean
the amount of radiation received per kilogram of body
weight. What the body weight is the smaller, a child is younger, smaller,
the SAR values bigger,
so more radiation is received!
Obviously the problem
is twofold: our Regulations on
The Highest Certified Power of the Tower Stations is made at
outdated the ICNIRP recommendations / the International committees
The Highest Certified Power of the Tower Stations is made at
outdated the ICNIRP recommendations / the International committees
of nonionizing
radiation/ the world scientists criticized
1999. those doses as too highly set.
So critics has come from Australia and New
Zealand, Sweden, USA, Italy ...
The works of dr .N. Cherry, Dr. H. Lai and
others who proved harm effect of the mobile towers, after all about
it the world congress was organized in our neighborhood
Vienna 1999, so the facts are known to the experts or at least they should be.
1999. those doses as too highly set.
So critics has come from Australia and New
Zealand, Sweden, USA, Italy ...
The works of dr .N. Cherry, Dr. H. Lai and
others who proved harm effect of the mobile towers, after all about
it the world congress was organized in our neighborhood
Vienna 1999, so the facts are known to the experts or at least they should be.
Another problem is that
in our country there is no legislation that obliges
the owner of the rising
tower to collect at least the consents of the neighbor tenants
because they are
affected the worst.
Many of them do not have the building license, nor the consent of the
Many of them do not have the building license, nor the consent of the
tenants who live in
that buildings so the overnight the tower stands on your roof
although you did not
know that anyone will place it there, practically on your head.
And you can not
disconnect it nor touch it no remove it because you are
damaging someone's
property!
It seems like for
rising the mobile phone tower the license is not needed!!!
The piracy rules on
this field of communications, and the illustration to this is the
fact
for inst. that Ministry
of Environmental Protection issued 38 licenses( according
the report of Novi List
from February 16th
2002 )
and only on
the territory of
Zagreb's Jarun-Knezija-Srednjaci-Vrbani
you may count down over
50 of them!
And we are talking
about the territory smaller then 10 square kilometers!
Who truly knows how
many mobile phone towers
are on the city
territory?
So we have the
situation that the tenants in the Street B. Magovca 165
are against mobile
phone tower, but the tower is there and no one knows
who let them put it on
the top of the building!!!. So, no one is responsible!
And the fact that our
Environmental Ministry does know how many towers
are around in the city,
because the number of issued licenses is far
lower that the number
of towers you may count by your own vision, illustrates well
the situation of random
setting the towers around...
WHO,World Health
Organization recommended that
the mobile phone towers is not to be raised close to the residential buildings ,
nor near schools and kindergardens, but its clear not on the hotels and hospitals!!!
the mobile phone towers is not to be raised close to the residential buildings ,
nor near schools and kindergardens, but its clear not on the hotels and hospitals!!!
But this is not
respected.
When my first article
was printed in Zagreb's Jutarnji list on December 31st
2001.
about this problem, my
phone was ringing all day because people were calling
to check if this was
true: shocked parents whose children attended elementary Jordanovac,
so as me once, did not
notice tower on the school's top!!!
But the tower is in Dobojska street,on the top of the secondary grammar school,
But the tower is in Dobojska street,on the top of the secondary grammar school,
top of Hrgovici street
65, a building right across children's
kindergarden in Pandakoviceva, on the other side of the street there is another phone tower
kindergarden in Pandakoviceva, on the other side of the street there is another phone tower
radiating their bad
energy to the students of elementary Bartol Kasic!
Elementary OS Precko has the phone tower.
Elementary OS Precko has the phone tower.
Illustrative situation
is in the street Hrgovici Jarun that has mobile phone towers
on the each 200-300 m
and the street lenght is some 1,5 kilometers!
On the beginning of the
street, on the opposite side there is T-Com building with
the reachly equiped
tower. Some 200 meter away there is hotel 'Jarun' with the
tower on the top, over
crossroad Hrgovici-Horvacanska the mentioned two
towers on each side of
the street the one, just 300 m away of the
last tower on the top
of the hotel...
In Klekova street, 100
m eastwards of the hotel there is another tower
on the top of the
residential building, of course.
So what is your
opinion, what density of radiation suffer the tenants of this street?
On January 7th
2001, Zagreb's Jutarnji list printed the article under the title:
"Soon the
prohibition of mobile phone towers on the kindergardens, schools and
hospitals, "
the statement of Mr.
vice health minister Afric.
Now, 11 and half years
later, I can only see that their number multiplied, and only two were
dismantled at my best knowledge: on the island Krk and in Domany
street 2, Zagreb.
This radiation is just
like the nuke radiation: poses no color, smell or taste and
irreversibly destroys
human health. The body registers cumulative effect,
remembers last received
dosis of radiation and adds all received.
The worst affected
according the EMMRA data sheets are infants,children, adults
and from organs, brain,
eyes, lungs, sex organs...
THERE IS NO DOSIS OF
NON-IONIZING RADIATION THAT IS HARMLESS.
ONLY HARMLESS IS TO
LIVE AND WORK THERE WHERE ARE NO TOWERS!!!
The recommendation to
place them at least 500 m away of residential areas no one respects.
Croatia is in the
world's peak counting new cases of cancer.
IARC evaluated
non-ionizing radiation as the potential carcinogenic.
No comments:
Post a Comment