Tuesday, November 13, 2012

PROTEST OF SLAVONSKI BROD CITIZENS AGAINST AIR POLLUTION



This article is comment on "Eko Kvarner's" dismissal request of the environmental minister Zmajlovic,
printed in Novi list, November 11th 2012.
 Published: November 12, 2012 at 18:25 

Unfortunately, the environment is polluted by man quickly, and passionately,  but slowly if at all possible, the pollution is cleansing. Conclusion that the problem is as old as Russian oil refinery in Bosanski Brod  is true, but we can not blame only the  Russian oil for it, or any other oil, because byproducts of refining, variations in percentages, they are all harm, not just benzene, many of them are carcinogenic! Aromatics have a long and evil, known history.  

The smoke is consisting of the condensed aromatic nuclei, nitrogen compounds, sulfur compounds, unfortunately some as sulfur dioxide with moisture in the lungs give sulphurous acid, which is not only irritating, but also over the long term damaging lungs by corrosion. By the same pattern acts N02. Hydrogen sulfide is known to turn smell rotten eggs, but when used in large quantities deadens sense of smell, deceiving us that is not present but is in turn in a BIG, DEADLY AMOUNT! 

Otherwise, the hydrogen sulfide belongs to the same group as the poison cyanide, the infamous Zyklon B, which were used in the concentration camps in World War II to kill the concentration camp prisoners ... And when we're up to the concentration camps prisoners,  the parallels come to my mind, with published statistics that the concentration of hydrogen sulfide is not normal, but UNDERNEATH it! NICE! This is what the Nazi leaders of the camp could use as the defense at the Nuremberg Trials: the concentration of hydrogen cyanide was typically below lethal in average, only in the days of poisoning poor innocent victims, was far over it ... On average. Camp prisoners could not be poisoned, they must have died from some mysterious, yet undiscovered illness and literally every each one! Statistics is very nice for juggling, but we do not need it. 

The fact is that even at the beginning of 2000-es, Mrs Dorica Nikolc said that the fight for a clean environment is very nice, but since then nothing has been done really ... Well, now some will tell that it is not so: that: we set up monitoring stations showing us contamination, when they are in function...  

But is that the air made cleaner, water less problematic, food strictly controlled? No. I understand the minister in charge Mr. Zmajlovic, because since Mr. Kovacevic, our relevant ministers have managed to overlook a lot of pollutions ... 

So from where to start now? Disposal of waste? Sava purity of water  Zagreb and all downstream  from river Sava, citizens drink, and cellulose factory in Krsko enriches by the dioxin ... Krsko not only pollute  by nuke and their the radio nuclides ...Incineratery facility  "Puto" set on firefew years ago,  made us unwished gift of dioxin poisoning and only God knows what else, the analysis never done nor published ... JANAF recognizes over 300 ruptured pipelines, spilled oil is still in the soil, no one can, however, and  even one will, to remove it. There is no magician stick for it. Population is for some time provided by water in tankers, but these are permanent pollution ... 

Prime minister Milanovic is tangled in energy saving bulbs, but we always catch the last wagon train. Thanks to them, the energy saving bulbs, mercury falls with rain falling on the fields of wheat and other crops, not just tuna  fish is full of mercury .. Energy saving bulbs radiate almost like nuke Krsko, give a bad light, when spent they should be disposed in the special containers for hazardous waste because they  belongs there.  

Newborns are born with tumors, is ANYBODY wondered why???  

Why our citizens population of  Kvarner islands above average get cancer but living in "clean" air environment ...The refinery Urinje poisons... The question is not  Ms. Holy or Mr. Zmajlovic or XY ... The question is why do we ignore the existence of the problem. 
The question is why we do nothing.  

Because ecology is also not throwing trash, papers, cigarette butts in the streets. Ecology is not to run the dogs on the playgrounds, ecology is pick up what dogs leave behind ... A metal pet waste oils belongs into a special container and not into the ground polluting it and furthermore the water basins. 
We have neatly stored one problem after another. We do not need the minister but Jesus Christ to solve all the problems, because only he could have solve them all ... Until then both, the people in Slavonski Brod so as in Bosanski Brod ( divided by the river Sava only), while praying, adds one sentence more: "... God let us a strong wind blowing today ..."

UPDATE 1:

I have seen that this post is read by quite lots of people, but please do not understand it wrong. I DO NOT underrate the problems of Slavonski Brod citizens and my sympathy are with them. I wanted them to know that it do not only stinks, but it damages health of citizens for they truly do HAVE THEIR RIGHT TO BREATH THE CLEAN AIR! 
This what I wanted to tell, but it is not written explicitly enough is that there where the refineries are, the problems are almost the same: Urinje refinery does the same damages to the people and to the environment, Sisak refinery as well,  Slavonski Brod through out Bosanski Brod, the same! The problem is that the refineries are built up in the cities and no one then, when decision was made about building them up, realized what torture this will be to the settlers...

But it should have been considered!!!

Just by the chance I lived in Caprag, down town of Sisak for several years in my childhood. I know what does it mean when you can not open the windows and how bad is when through out closed windows black clouds of pollution gets into your rooms: we were poisoned by the iron and steel factory Sisak where my father worked in...The tap water run yellow, had to be boiled...

And yes, there are the filters that could filtrate smokes from the refinery but due to the crude particles in the smokes, the filters will be blocked and useless in no time. They are expensive, but the health of the people is not cheap neither. The fact that the refinery belongs to the other state rises up the problem to the international level that only politics can solve:can and have to!

But the problem is that this situation is not only up to the good will of some one, the contradictory interests are impacting and make it far tougher than the chemistry complicates it.
So I truly wish them to solve the problem as soonest but, sorry,  I am afraid that it might not be so...


UPDATE 2:

January 19th 2013.

I see that this article is the most read on this blog, because of reason why the concerned citizens have no other source of infos that will satisfied their concern. And their concern has grounds!

There were comments then, when the other heating mean will be used, such as the gas instead of coal there will be no problem for the citizens of both Brod's. At my opinion, the pollution of air did not made only heating gasses released by natural process of burning, but mixture of burning gases and gases released by process of the refining of the oil. Most of the sulfur gases and some crude particles comes from processing just the Russian oil that is known of having the highest part of sulfur in it so already by drilling it, the problems occur because this sulfur blocks the pipes...
Both problems could be sold in no time by installing the filters that seeks additional investment, but the investment in medical treatment and the remedies costs the money too.

So please, be honest and tell the people openly why their health is on the rocks because they have right to know that! Health not only elderly people, but babies and children is imperiled too. That have to be our main concern and accelerator in our action towards achieving clean air.

Because they have right to have it!!!

There is sentence: Help yourself so Lord will help you too...

Therefore, please, citizens of both Brod, sign the petition requesting installing filters because it CAN be done and OUGHT to be done ASAP. Take care for this petition to be handled to the owners of the refinery, because they are obliged by law, or have to be, to provide the most safe process in refinery not only for the environment but for the refinery workers too... I wish you good luck... 

Remind the owners that the most precious you have, your health is damaged, day by day by the vapor and gases coming from refinery; the price of filters is not your concern, but the price of healing your damaged health is...

I wish to remind you that you can write your comments or put your question and I will reply to them by my best knowledge. Thank you for reading my blog, best luck in your action!



Update 3:

May 15th 2013:

Dear citizens of both Brods, Slavonski and Bosanski Brod, PLEASE do sign petition on installing the filters in refinery RIGHT AWAY, because the announced news in media for refinery goes in renewing and redoing the process if ever starts, will take times and the still days are coming and therefore there will be no wind to dilute released poisons in the air, so their presence in the air will reach the critical values many times from now on.

Please, also, keep in mind that the problem might be bigger than it looks like at the firs sight: all of that poison pollutants will get down to the ground sooner or later, polluting ground and all what grows on it, it says that the imperiled citizens are not only BREATHING IN polluted air, they EAT polluted crops and DRINK polluted water, because this is the natural circle of processes in nature.

They may do in refinery what they want but THE FILTER FIRST, P L E A S E!!!

The filters will not disturb the process of renewing, but can help imperiled citizens to breath the cleaner air.

So, the mayors of both cities sit down, and please work out your strategy to protect yours citizens lives, but what ever your conclusion comes out, first step done yesterday MUST BE FILTERS FIRST!!!

Because yours citizens have right to have clean air and environment, this is their basic right!

Friday, November 2, 2012

NORDENAU HEALING WATERS



Living in Germany then, since 1988, I have read similar article in Königsteiner Woche 1992.

I wish the more possible people read it, because it truly helps, papers wrote that in case of radiation damages, this was ONLY helping poor children of Chernobyl. As you will see, it helps for the other illnesses too...
I recall reading the article, it was written the legend local people believe in, that Jesus Christ himself blessed this waters. You may not to believe in it but it truly helps!




Have a WaterFul Day!
 
UPDATE....Since its discovery in 1992, the spring of healing water in Nordenau, Germany, has been visited daily by hundreds of people from all over the world.

The spring is in a slate mine on the property of the Hotel Tommes in the Winterberg Mountains near Düsseldorf. Newspaper and television reports have spoken of miraculous healings attributed to the water, as people said to have been declared incurable by medical science have been healed of a variety of illnesses and medical conditions.

A particularly interesting story is that of an 18-year-old boy from Kiev. He and a number of other "children from Chernobyl" had been invited to Nordenau by Mr and Mrs Tommes (proprietors of Hotel Tommes). As a result of the nuclear accident at the Chernobyl power plant the boy was suffering from a very unusual form of lymphatic cancer which had already spread to his stomach and chest. This meant that he experienced great difficulty in breathing and was easily exhausted. Doctors had given up on him, declaring him to be incurably ill. During his visit to Nordenau, he went to the spring in the mine twice a day and after some time was well enough to cycle over the surrounding hills on a mountain-bike. After a stay of five weeks the symptoms of his illness had virtually disappeared. On leaving Germany and returning to Kiev the young man got a job and says he feels fine.

Research carried out in 1992 by a Dr Steinbruck from Frankfurt involved investigating the cases of 42 visitors to the healing spring. Of these cases, 30 per cent were completely cured; in 28 per cent of the cases there was a significant improvement in their condition; and in 26 per cent their condition had improved to some extent. These findings were confirmed by doctors. Recent research carried out by a Dr Gadek on 515 visitors who had drunk water from the spring, showed that, independent of age and personality type, in almost all cases there was a significant improvement in the quality of life after drinking the healing water.

Nordenau water was tested and investigated in the laboratories of Professor Shirahata in Fukuoha in Japan. It was discovered that diseases and conditions such as cataracts and arthritis and the initial stages of multiple sclerosis respond well to, and can be successfully treated with, Nordenau water. In May 1999 Professor Shirahata addressed a conference on molecular biology in Lugano, Switzerland, and spoke of the 'phenomenal' healing power of Nordenau water. He is currently studying the effects of the water on tumors and plans to publish his findings in 2000. Information about various studies is available from the Hotel Tommes.

Isn't it nice to know that some of the best things in Life don't need to be so complicated and that you have the power to change your life simply by changing your water.
Have a WaterFul day!
www.KangenWaterMagic.info

Sunday, September 2, 2012

GMO FOOD AS SAFE AS CONVENTIONAL???


In the Spring of 2003, Mr. Maryanski visited our country to convince us that GMO food is as safe as the conventional! This is my reply to him, printed in March 2003, in Novi list, Rijeka, Croatia.





New List
51000 Rijeka
Zvonimirova 20 a
      

Editorial

Heading for-reactions to the article: GM food is safe
as well as conventional
I have read your above article with interest,

Ms. N. Domazet government obviously matter, seems to me
more then the distinguished gentleman J.H. Maryanski,
although to him is available more knowledge on a larger scale,
to the matter of GMO's, therefore
it is inexcusable that we usurps his rights to sell us a horn as a
candles.
It's sad that people who are sitting at the FDA, may give such the statements
your ditinguished Novi list printed in the interview. Because
a claim which was printed in the title is straight
misrepresentation. And knowingly, with the target
intent.
Mr. Maryanski says they never-guess the FDA, received
information that such foods are harmful.

I ask whether he was aware of the case of tryptophan,
Japanese manufacturer Showa Denko-which exactly in the
country of Honorable Mr. Maryanski comes (it was imports from Japan to the USA), took 37
of lives, and over 1500 people were left with permanent
disability. It is the world's public
known, so how does it comes that to him it is not?
    
I wonder if Mr. Maryanski heard of tests
Dr. A. Pusztai, which was the disclosure of the truth, that
GM potatoes hardly damage immune system, liver,
brain, stomach wall, etc., he was forced to withdrew from the tests,
sent in to retirement,
but his true results nonetheless found their way,into publicity.
Dr.Pusztaia results were confirmed by other scholars in the world.
    
I wonder if it is a safe product GM beef hormone
growth that just in the country of Mr. Maryanski
caused over 2000% increase in morbidity from lymphoma, and
causes prostate cancer, breast cancer and nearly 40%
enlargement of the spleen, and why the FOX TV reporter
from Tampa, Mrs Jane Akre was fired because she did not
wanted to fix a report on this product. Judicial
epilogue of a judgment was in favor of Ms. Akre, the compensation of
overall 850,000 U.S. Doll. Ms. Akre obviously,
and so the court ruled, put forward the truth. (beef
growth hormone through milk due to all other
dairy products in the EU is banned, but the country in
Eastern Europe ais used, and this is the area from which we import
a large amount of 'our' milk-Caution, therefore:).
    
March 12th, 1999th York's Nutrition Laboratory announced
report on the rise of allergies in the UK from 50% in the
1998 year, which is tied to the use of GM soybeans, used in the
production of wide range of products such as the
chocolate to cosmetics and food of course, and
baby food as well.
    
The Berlin Medical Chamber's September 8th, 1998 announced
joint report with Greenpeace, a warning that
Novartis maize causes resistance to antibiotics
ampicillin, amoxicillin and penicillin, are the ones who
and prescribe the most, because the built-in corn
resistance gene (marker, to see what is
obtained by gene technology because they often fails
achieved what they wanted!)
    
What about the GM fish in the country Honourable Mr.
Maryanski? What is a genetic mistake made in
reproductive system because fish in wild waters
(reproduces naturally without any problems) coupled with
GM fish no longer reproduces, are sterile!
    
Why Russia has returned the entire shipment of GM maize
Novartis back (Russia has a law prohibiting the importation of GM
product-we still do not!) in August 1999.?
    
Why is the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul in December
1999,  issued an order for the destruction of up to 1 million
acres sown by GM soybeans?
    
Why is in the Indian state of Gujarat, GM cotton crops harvest
turned to ashes and smoke in November 2001?( after they have discovered
they seeded GMO cotton seeds instead of natural, exported them ' by mistake'!)
    
Why do the Japanese have refused further shipments of corn from
Mr. Maryanski country?( After discovering it was GMO!)
    
Why is hungry Africa refused GM food and prefere go
hungry than sick?
    
What happened to that Monarch butterfly,
there is no longer in its wintering grounds in Mexico (in 1999's
Cornell University published a report that
GM corn pollen pushed it into extinction)?
    
Why is Deutsche Bank New York, May 21st 1999
published report:" GMO's are Dead"-consultation for the
money not be invested in GM foods because they
no longer make a profit!
    
Why Greenpeace USA released the "Shopping List"
booklet with a list of products to the US markets
listing the products that do not contain,
phase out or contain GM products; why if the GM products are
as safe as conventional foods, as it claims Mr.
Maryanski?!?
    
Why did the USA maintained demonstrations against GM
StarLink corn, which they finished in their tacos, and they,
the USA, are exporting to Mexico (because to
Mexicans I guess, the GMO's are good enough), but when the
boomerang came back then it was no longer
OK??? 

Because that certain corn gained permission for sale
'only' in fodder ( but it usedfor the production of 
vitamin C, so that almost all the vitamin C
in the United States is produced from GM raw materials).
As if between
animal fodder and human food there is a Chinese wall, as if the
livestock fed by GM soy and corn not end on the
plates of people in the form of a fine steak, etc. and
brings us to the human body all that Frankenstein technology.

But this story not ends here, this is only the beginning.
The beginning of a story tragic for man kind.
    
Mr. Maryanski, since you're so bad
informed, while you position claims better
information,  I'd recommend one interesting
book by author Dr. Mae-Wan Ho: Engineering,
subtitle Dream or Nightmare, that explains the dangers of
'harmless' GM 'food'.

Anyway, the lady doctor British scholar, held a lecture on
Genetic engineering and participated in discussions about the
harms of GMO's in the UN, the European Parliament, the World
Bank and others. Since 1994. she is an advisor to the Third World
Network-on issues in gene engineering,
biotechnology and biosafety.
    
Space does not permit to present harms of soy you are taking as the example,
rejecting statements it causing allergy
you deny the danger, only to mention the facts from book
Mrs. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho,: when the finally Round Up Ready
soy were analyzed, after years of using in fodder,
molecular analysis shown, the order of genes
were messed up, but at the genetic intervention
indeterminate plant genome also messes and also,
534 fragments of unknown origin are found in soy.
All this differs from the original data by Monsanto
provided.
    
What these fragments represent ? Are they
toxic compounds, carcinogenic, teratogenic, mutagenic?
Perhaps not, but no one is bothered
to examine it!
No one has provided any evidence of
the existence and activity of these substances.
    
What does that mean? Simply, they did not get what
was meant, and what is gotten, they did not fundamentally
analyzed.

Well, if no allergy in the first generation
consumption occures, does not mean that there will be continued, because
transgenic genes lie low in the genome [silencing]
even when they are not expressed.This infernal machine
may explode at any time, and the trigger can be any
bacteria, virus, others transgenic gene from other GMO food etc.
    
Since you mentioned the famous Golden rice, which is
archived now, sent to be improved in the next 5 years back to
International Institute for rice (IRRI),
they are due to remove the resistance antibiotic genes

So Mr. Maryanski, you never said a word about, is it
possible that you did not know it has the antibiotic resistance gene?
Neither you said it does not cover
needs on vitamin A, because adult
day intake should consume 18 kg of rice (!) to meet
physical needs on vitamin A, which in turn in Asia (which is supposedly
product intended) covers by glass of papaya juice
or two tablespoons of palm oil.
    
After all when we're on the rice, there is another kind
of rice growing in your country, in Sutter County, the
Greenpeace discovered plantations, without any protection and measures
of pollution of the environment, in that rice was introduced
minimum of two proteins from human breast milk, intended for
the pharmaceutical industry! The same report says
the rice, subject to GM rice contamination was
exported to other countries (the report said Japan and
Turkey and GM raw materials for pharmaceuticals were
exported in at least Canada and France - also
notes that 20 countries have already produced drugs from
GM products!)

A report from Greenpeace USA, September 7th,  2001.

It comes from your country Mr. Maryanski!

We, from a half of the globe distance know it, but you do not?


After all, that so many words, are not needed: the FAO report from the
July 2000  clear put out the 4 pages of text in
under the headline:
"GM crops do not need to feed world"


UPDATE I:

Facts from Greenpeace site about Ecological Farming Facts:

Quick facts about agriculture:

  • Ten corporations control nearly 70 percent of the world's seed market. This corporate control of agriculture means farmers have less choice.
  • Genetic Engineering does not feed the world. 99.5 percent of farmers around the world do not grow Genetically Engineered crops.
  • Industrial polluting agriculture uses synthetic fertilizers and toxic chemicals which pollute our water and soils – the very things we need in order to provide healthy food now and in the future.
  • Excessive use of synthetic fertilizers in industrial polluting agriculture contributes to climate change.   





UPDATE II:

GMO:

just to let you know that EU released decision on seeding or non seeding GM crops to each EU member on the own decision.
I am asking myself who sits in EC of EU: for UK complained on air pollution by Sahara sand!
IF Sahara sand can get to UK, the GM pollen, far easier, can get from Spain to Croatia, Poland...
By this, our efforts to eat organic foods seems goes in vain...
The petition against GM crops, signed by the million citizens of EU and handed to the health minister of EU government on December 9th 2010, seems like being farce!

Data for above taken from 3 SAT: nano at 6.26 PM today, JUNE 13th 2014.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

ZAGREB IN NUKE SANDWICH, FINE!



E mail sent to Novi list, Rijeka, printed in July 2001.



For column: Reactions: In addition article Croatia is building a huge nuclear waste disposal
TO: 1 recipient



Ladies and gentlemen of the editorial board of the New List,

Reading title of this article I felt goose bumps, reading
article further more, I shuddered stronger! Come on,
people, what are we doing??? Who was mad to bring
such a decision on the construction? Why you did not take the statement
of the Environment Minister Kovacevic? Does anyone in our country understand,
what means stocking 18,000 cubic
meters of radioactive waste approximately 80 km southeast of
Zagreb, when Krsko nuke plant is for 40 km to the west?

ZAGREB IN NUKE SANDWICH, FINE!!!

This is precisely what we
need! And no reactions of authorities, however did
none of them has a conscience?
  
Are we are the problem of radioactivity of neighbor country
solving by pushing the nuke waste to Bosnians to their border in Kostajnica?

Like, radioactivity will spread just to the south, we are
saved. Well, I'm sorry that movie does not play, because
radioactivity neatly laid out within the circle of harmed
places! Towards Croatia too!
  
Even if Croatia needs actually to take radioactive
waste from Krsko plant, how actually there are tons, drums...of it?
Does really 18,000 cubic meters or someone 'smart' but 'thoughtful'
want to earn good money taking somebody else's, not radioactive
waste, but radioactive death for all of us? '

Does anyone from architects really think they could design
disposal perfectly RADIOACTIVE TIGHT?!? Are they
really so naive?!
Gentlemen, go down to the city Stone, the destructive effect
last earthquake you can still see there. Can you
indeed guarantee that this will be the perfect
RADIOACTIVE TIGHT DISPOSAL?!? HOW YOU CAN
PROVE THAT?!? By endangering our lives???
Build a nuclear waste disposal in QUAKE UNSAFE ZONE
is equal to expectation the safe sailing of the boat or ship
with pierced bottom. I'm sorry I'm not naive enough to buy
that.

Your attempts to convince me are choking me, stopped in my throat.

Who can measure the radioactivity of 18,000 cubic meters of the
radioactive waste??? By what equipment?Geiger dosimeter? Forget Sieverts and
millisieverts, Bequerels, units which we measured
radioactivity of the Chernobyl accident, and IT WAS
DEVASTATING!
If there is no such device that
can endure so much RADIOACTIVITY to measure it? Giga,
or Terabecquerels? Who will dare to go down to disposal lot to
MEASURE IT??? In case of leaking of the radioactivity -
cracking of steel concrete, caused by the earthquake
or something else, who will dare to send workers
closer to this hell on earth to patch it???
What Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they will be dead before
coming to leaking place! And we all with
them soon, very soon. And the creators of this idiotic idea too!
How many Chernobyl nuclear power plant radioactivity the creators
of that mighty idea think shall be stored on the territory of the touristic
Croatia??
No less important is this: I think the creators of
waste disposal hope that Croatia will be allowed to enter Europe
with 18,000 deadly ballast, so that the hot
deadly potato we will hand them over to solve the problem for us ?!? Forget it!
They have to many of the waste and to many problems with it, too.

But get real, the problem lies elsewhere. Russia to which they have
tried to push such a 'convenient collection point' of waste disposal
deadly nuclear waste said NO!
Logically, we need it now to store it
elsewhere!But where?!? The answer lies in
front of our legs. LITERALLY!
    
Just to remind you, Krsko has done it.
Twenty years has just passed. There is no magic
wand that will make it safe for the environment
ever, even when it's put still. Incidentally, costs
of preservation are higher than the costs of construction, I wish
I would be wrong! Greenpeace Austria notes on
its website a number of accidents in the plant.
Why we do not know of anyone?
Or someone knows. What's
happened on March 1st 2000 when broadened the rumor not
to drink tap water from Sava river because it is polluted.
The people from Istria were calling relatives in Zagreb to warn them. Too late,
of course, because we are the last one to know ...

The woman, working as the pediatrics in Slovenia then, confirmed
me having heard air raid sounded, that marked accident in Krsko...
Does the average citizen of Croatia knows what she/he
should know? Does they know how the samples are taken for
water analysis? Does they know that they are waiting for once a week
samples arrive from Slovenia, so we have only average weekly sample
united for measurement that gives only the average
radioactivity? Rather than take the troubled getting to Sava river to grab the water
daily and analysing it, asking Krsko what that peaks means!?!

As far as I'm concerned that radioactivity in the Krsko nuke plant,
Slovenians will treat adequate with care and thoroughly, but I am very
concerned of the radioactivity river Sava near Zagreb, for solving
this issue should concern us all!
  
And do not assume that the radioactivity that
comes from Krsko is indeed zero.

The radioactive waste is used fuel from the nuke plants consisting from 1 pct of
plutonium, 96 pct of uranium and the rest are so called fission products, highly
radioactive. So its not THE WASTE but DEADLY RADIOACTIVE WASTE!
At the reprocessing it, the environment is highly polluted and polluting each day of
the air, ground and the sea waters...
The 'production' of waste in 2000 was at the level of 220,000 tons, and it growths
each year 10,000 tons more so today level would be 340,000 tons at least...

There are three polygons
of reprocesing radioactive waste in Europe,
Sellafield British, French La Hague, and Russian Cheljabinsk.
British facing the Irish Sea as we would our waste disposal
should be facing Bosnia, such as Hungary
nuclear power plant faces Osijek...
In the hinterland of La Hague, the concentration of the
radionuclides / within 35 km, which corresponds to an almost
distance from Zagreb to Krsko / in soil and water, measured
override the results of the pollution that came from
the Chernobyl disaster in 2900 and the ground water 140 times!

In Britain, the radioactivity was measured in the teeth of all the children
that were taken extracted teeth.
Analysis showed the value of strontium 90, 1000 x
times the allowable concentration of plutonium.
Of course, the teeth were extracted because wrinkling
bone for analysis was very painful, but it indicates
condition in the bone system of the whole organism. Strontium,
that belongs to group 2 of the periodic system, as well as calcium
has similar properties as calcium, so strontium replaces calcium in the bones,
a very harm mechanism...
Hence, to the bone marrow from the bone is very close...
Blood is produced in the bone marrow.
So the first sign of exposition to radioactivity shows our blood by various
types of blood abnormalities.

I hope you have carefully read the above, written as
the point is, that relates to all kids of UK, and only one plant
exists on the coast of the Irish Sea, Sellafield. This one
irradiated the entire population of UK.
But Sellafield has so far reprocessed several thousand tons of the
waste, and the creators of the brilliant idea Kostajnica disposal
had to take care of 18,000 cubic
meters radiactive waste. / To know specific gravity would easily calculate
as far as tone /.
Further, French doctors have studied the incidence
leukemia in La Hague, not a elderly people one, but the young
people. In a sample of 192 people found that 27 people
under 25 who are suffering from leukemia., thus
considered that the causal relationship between
radioactivity and leukemia is proven!
For those who know German please check
Information on the site:
www.greenpeace.de/ARCHIV/HOMEPAGE/
A970910.HTM and also:
www.greenpeace.de / GP WHILE 3P /
PRESSEMI/P97080.HTM
/ If you do not do it, go to Greenpeace Germany,
Presseerklaerungen vom 8.1 1997-Atomkraft /
Furthermore, do not think that Krsko is a single plant
in our surroundings. In Hungary we have a nuke 'across the street'
then a little further Bulgarian/Romanian border Kozloduj 4 reactors in Bulgaria, and
Mochovice and Bohunice in Slovakia, all type of Chernobyl.
Moreover Ukraine plans to construct Hmeljnjicki 2 and Rovno
4! / B. Incidentally Hmreljnjicki was Ukrainian Duke
that wanted to save Ukraine from the invasion of the Turks signed
pact with Russia and Ukraine thus lost its
independence and regained it only after collapse of the USSR.
Ukrainians were cursing him for centuries because of lost independence
but it seems that his symbolic name brings only bad to Ukraine people
by destroyed lives and polluted land-by Chernobyl disaster/

I invite all your readers to come forward and make their contribution
to the discussion of whether we need nuclear waste disposal.
In the article states 'moral obligation'... Why is there a moral obligation
only of Croatia, but Slovenia does not comply with the moral obligation and repay
depositors of Ljubljanska bank foreign exchange savings that they owe us since collapse of Yugoslavia?


This article was printed in Novi list in July 2001.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION



Mid December 2009  Croatia is evaluated as the 48th country in the world concerning environmental issues that caused shock in media...Only then and not again the media asked why is it so....

Unfortunately, the position of the environment protection in our country was reduced on the enthusiasm of unpaid 'catastrophics' how Dr.Sci. Jelaska, the accademist, named us irronicaly.

Some of us are joined in a handful of interest groups from the pure SPITE fighting for better living conditions for the nation, although they know that their efforts are measured and categorized as a attack of Don Quixote on windmills. Here and there appears a short dash or photo of their actions, such as today's sale of the golf ball instead of eggs, as a protest to the 'golfisation' of the agricultural fields on which crops do not grows but the jack golf holes. 'Bitten wolf by Gretel', there is no political will to draw more serious cuts, because we know we have no money ...

Anyway we have only handful of such eco groups such as Eko Kvarner, Zeleni Osijek, Eko Zadar, Zelena Akcija, Eko Pan-Karlovac, and Zeleno Srce dealing with the County ecoproblems of Sisak-Moslavina County.
More than ten years ago I wanted to see Greenpeace in Croatia, talk to Austrian Greenpeace, German Greenpeace and Headquarters in the Netherlands but I was clearly been told the priority is India, Israel, we are not in plans...Only what we got was visit of Mr. Benny Haerlin...

A list on which we occupy the infamous low rating are not the only categorized by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe, according to the press freedoms we are somewhere at the infamous the same level, and according the purity from 'GMO free countries' English internet site 'genwatch' placed us on the list of growers of GMOs, because of GMO corn growth.

Bioethical Council established 1999 to stop penetration of GMO's to Croatia, or at least we believed so, on 'The Round Table Against GMO's' organized on April 10th 1999 by HSS party, under the presidency of the same above named accademist issued Permition to conduct tests by Pioneers GMO corn seeds “ of only 1 kgs seed” but in Belje appeared hectars of GMO grown corn by some sort of magic corn...??...

So from GMO free country in shortest time we become a GMO grower.

Good that catchword 'Croatia-heaven on earth' masterpiece of our tourism minister that was withdrawn because it would sound very grotesque ...As well thousands useless posters printed with the written 'Croatia-GMO free country'...

I wish it were, truly...
At one time, in one of the election show Ms. politician DN evaluate the environmental theme as 'nice theme', but still no progress after that words ...
    
When our 'whistle blowers' warn on substances harmful to humans and the environment, the people of power hush them up right away, ridicules, laugh out their so called ' incompetence'.
Starting from my own: in February of 2005 I have sent the article in the Zagreb's daily Vjesnik, in that article I responded to the former article of my former professors from the university (not taught me, but I did graduate in the department), who pointed out that there are no people who are ready to show reaction and send replies to the certain problems. I just wanted to express my support to him so wrote the article the harmful and toxic substances in daily use, it has been printed, but has caused the attention I did not expected. The state toxicologist named me ' the lady that all disturbs her', a strong toxicological argument!

This gentleman defended himself that in its 'database' has no reports of toxicity tera phthalates and Teflon. Evidently we do not use the same data base so I found out that in the USA noticed that the teflon kitchen ware caused death of home pets canaries, who are very sensitive to toxic fumes. Seems like it was sufficient alert for the USA citizens that something is wrong with teflon, but we seems do not care much.

So some one had to warn the nation.
Although he was in charge to do it.
    
I do not understand how Teflon could get the FDA trade license as a safe product, such unstable compounds such as Teflon, which at the temperatures above 300 degrees Celsius collapse evaporating fumes and crude particles of teflon decomposition, releasing for inst. compound in small quantities, true, indeed, but very poisonous, identical to that found in the Baxter dialyzers responsible for over twenty deaths of kidney patients in Croatia!

To check above you do not need internet data base but our subject book, please see Noller: Chemistry Of Organic Compounds, and from that book, colleague toxicologist and me have exams on our Faculty ...

SO I DO POLITELY REQUEST THAT THE STICKER YOU GET TO THIS POTTERY WITH WARNING NOT TO OVERHEAT IT, DO YOUR EFFORTS TO R E S P E C T IT!


Even better DO NOT USE TEFLON WARE AT ALL!!!


About the harmful effects of the tera-phthalates all the publications wrote a month later ...
  

It is also notorious fact that the Pliva acidic sewage leaked all way down to river SAVA, that is known from the 80-ies of last century.

It is not clear to me how it was washed out from the underground, because Jarun was declared water protection zone. I pray that your readers evaluate the quality of water protection zones where the gas station ought to be built at Horvacanskoj, close to the central heating pipe lines!
  
And it's not a evil remark that if we continue to pollute sources of drinking water, in the way we are doing, soon we may be very thirsty! And not only Pliva acidic sewage leaking is responsible, we have in the water pesticides (eg atrazine), nitrogen compounds of NPK fertilizer in the water. ..

In our TV “Croatia Alive” mrs. Vesna Pusic mentioned that from the 82 tested sources of waters, only 12 had sufficient quality of water, that means majority fails!

And of course that the great deal of Zagreb's citizens, if not all are drinking Sava river waters, filtrated trough out pebbles of Sava banks. Filtered from what??? Can for inst. dioxin from celulose factory Krsko be filtered? Can radioactivity be filtered??

Why was dr. Sci.Branica literally to his death warning us on overheating Sava river:why is Sava overheated, because of insufficient supply of water to the cooling system of Krsko nuke plant, or I hope not, something is wrong with the process...
By the way when you have read last time data on radioactivity river Sava? EVER read??
    
Of course my disobey was paid by disconnection of my phone for 12 days because of the 'broken wire', and that 3 teams of T-Com's technicians were not able to find out what was wrong ( the phone bill was paid). Of course my defense Vjesnik did not print even though they are obliged to do so under The Law on the Press ...
      
'Lady who all bothers' lived in Sisak' Caprag early 50s of the last century, water was flowing from the taps yellow, we had to boiled it, and only when a strong wind blew clouds of black smoke did not choked us, in our homes near by closed windows ! Ecological problems of Sisak, our Chelyabinsk, does not come from yesterday ...

For leaking our pipeline Naftovod they blame corrosion. Fuel oil tanks in accidents are often polluting soil, water, underwater, underground water. The residents are supplied by tanks of drinking water, but for how long?

Because it is unfortunately permanent pollution! Because this contamination as well as the radionuclides contamination is contamination of the worst kind and its IMPOSSIBLE TO REMOVE IT...

Exxon Valdez oil tanker on March 24th 1989, stranded in the Sound of Prince William in Alaska, known fact: fifteen years later, American chemists and biologists checking the efficiency of cleansing of the Sound. Unfortunately for them they found that all the animals with fish in the food chain are sick, laid eggs were sterile ...

This legacy of oil pollution will remain permanently!
  
Unfortunately, surface contamination precipitate into the deeper layers, the evaporation of soil moisture by drying them again only takes them to shallower layers, but pollution remains ...

    COP 15 - the climate summit in Copenhagen of city mayors gives hope that at least something will be change, but I'm afraid that's already 12:15! But the tiny results as in Durban and further more... And we simply stupidly rejecting to understand that our time for protection of our environment is inevitably running out of our time...

Twelve hours was the eighties of last century, when Bhopal happened in India:December 2/3rd. 1984, 40 tons of methyl isocyanate escaped into the atmosphere in Union Carbide's pesticide factory. It is estimated that there died immediately 8,000-10,000 and another 15,000 victims died later from the effects of poisoning. A totally exposed to inhalation of methyl isocyanate was over 520 000 people, serious damage to health remained at 120,000 citizens, however, of these 10-15 are dieing monthly. Only in 1997. died the 2165 victims. Damages of $ 400 per capita did not get all because of corruption in administration ...

Chernobyl as it is well known, has caused 57 deaths by direct irradiation, died of cancer 4,000, a figure as well as for Bhopal is not final ...

From amids last century, Mato Grosso, rainy forests in Brazil reduced in 60 years to approximately 1/3 of its surface! We have by incredible speed succeeded to destroy 2/3 of the lungs of our planet! And that plants absorb carbon dioxide in their photosynthesis of chlorophyll dismissing our precious oxygen. And we did not need an artificial tree with substances that break down carbon dioxide, plants, our green layer doit for us millions of years already and still gives us oxygen!
And speaking of Mato Grosso, there are contaminated waterways by mercury that the gold miners used for gold amalgamation. It is exactly this mercury that causes the extinction of the first nations of the rain forest ...
 As soon as we stop cutting of the Amazon rainforest   we ​​will be breathing easier, literally!
  
Iceland is the habitat of bird species that call the sea parrot. Ornithologists, who as a child was able to count in one night, a hundred sea-parrot than, can now in 'good night' observing, count only 20 of them ... So where are all the birds gone?
    
Unfortunately, contamination of the Earth has reached a critical point so right are those who shout slogans that we have no country B!

Neither we do have clean water, no fresh air, no clean country, and we want to eat pure food.

Well people, to paraphrase Delic, 'Oh, is it possible ...' How? How will this affect our children, our grandchildren?

Greenpeace has tested the Oetztaler Alps fish that swim in the clear and thought-clear waters of the Alps at 2800 m altitude. Findings were stunned: the fish were literally poisoned by bromine compounds derived from flame retardants, phthalate-wax softener and chlorine, toxaphene, PCBs, and so long ago banned DDT. The concentration of toxins in fish ranged up to 911 micrograms per kg of fat tissue...

Please do not eat alpine trout!

Comment by Mr. Manfred Krautter, Greenpeace expert in chemistry: "Chemistry is out of control, it is endangering the entire continent to the highest mountain peaks. Effect of the so-called. 'global distillation' of the toxic substances that are released into the atmosphere as the smokes, above the cold part of the Globe such as the Alps or the Poles moisture is freezing into snow and in the form of snow falls back to the ground.

Tests revealed that the wild animals and the population, for example, Inuit (the tests were conducted on them) are highly poisoned!
    
The interaction of chemicals with our bodies and our health, chemicals that surround us are we aware of that fact or not, wanted we to be dipped into chemicals or not, we can not choose others, our chemical background is always present.

Unfortunately, pollution is cumulative, accumulate in fat tissue, breast feeding mothers transmit it to children ...

 Yes, we are 48th in world rankings in the environment protection, we truly deserved it, accompanied by the countries that do not care for the environment, taking it for granted. Yes, we have no money, but do others have it much more - when exactly those who are the wealthiest in the ranking occupied last places on the list ... We must get serious, we must get responsible, because as the First Nations of America say: This land we have not received as a the gift, we borrowed it from our fathers and mothers to leave it to our children.

Fine heritage we are leaving to them!

All our errors they will be forced to correct, because they will feel them the toughest.

RACTOPAMINE

Euronews transferr this info:

" National Hog Farmer, US: RACTOPAMINE

The Codex Alimentarius Commission – the joint food standards program of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has adopted global food safety standards for ractopamine hydrochloride.
More About:

The Codex Alimentarius Commission – the joint food standards program of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has adopted global food safety standards for ractopamine hydrochloride.

Elanco Animal Health markets two brands of ractopamine hydrochloride – Paylean for swine and Optaflexx for cattle.

The commission’s action, which becomes final on July 7, adopts an Acceptable Daily Intake and Maximum Residue Levels for pig and cattle muscle, fat, liver and kidney. The human safety of meat products derived from pigs and cattle fed ractopamine had been confirmed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives in 2004, 2006 and 2010 and by 27 regulatory authorities from around the world."



Ractopamine is growth hormone that:
-changes blood pressure, systolic pressure increases after intake, observed on mice and rats, slowly goes down after a while, dyastolic unchanged...
-chromosome aberration positive on lymphocytes, explained by secondary auto oxidative effect from ractopamine catechol that produces reactive intermediates
-carcinogenicity: not yet observed but causes benign leiomyomas( tumor of smooth muscles)in test on mice and rats due to beta-adrenergic activity
-causes muscle tremor used oral
-behaviour changes:feelings of reslessness, apprehension and anxiety


In EU its forbidden.


So having in mind these side effects, what do you think drug like that can do to human body? Do we indeed need any drugs-additives to the fodder?


0The past is still to close when Bowine Growth Hormone caused increase in cancer cases in USA over 2000 pct after the drug was introduced to arise yield of milk in cows, in 1994???!

Friday, July 20, 2012

REPLY OF THE STATE TOXICOLOGIST DR. F. PLAVSICTO THE ARTICLE "TOXIC AND HARM MATERIALS IN DAILY USE




"In recent months appeared on the different sides the self-appointed toxicologists who even published a book( “The E numbers and the food additives” written by spouses Vrcek) and to whom is not known the basic concepts of toxicology. This time drove my the reaction engineer Tatijana Malacko in her article" The materials in the application although the toxic and carcinogenic "(Vjesnik, February 18
th 2005).
 
The lady, her like-minded the Vrčeks, shows they do not know the basic concepts of toxicology, and sources of data collected this entire group as "toxicologist", are very strange.
Complete a nonsense to claim that PET packaging or Teflon cancerogenic or that aspartame is the culprit for many harmful effects in diabetic patients who take them. I wonder just why the diabetologists such claims have not responded. I emphasize once again that it is total ignorance ... and I was still ashamed to write that these are even people who have listened to lectures on my postgraduate course in toxicology.
 
No one from the authors of such claims could find data in official database of the European Union or the World Health Organization (WHO), the authors of stories about dangerous teflon or PET packaging such information could not be found. I looked at, for example, data on Teflon in a very respectable base Micromedex and found what I already know. Teflon is inert, insoluble in water solutions and there is no possibility of its penetration into the body, either through the digestive system or skin.
It could get into the lungs when it would develop, during cooking, aerosol of teflon, which seems highly unlikely. It has long been known that at temperatures above 600 degrees Celsius leads to degradation of Teflon with the low formation of a hazardous substances, including the worst perfluoroizobutilen (known as a cause of death of our citizens in Baxter dializator disaster), but it is not a carcinogen.

A similar story is with the PET packing, from which it may release small molecules (eg color), if it contains. It is insoluble in water and therefore no possibility to be in any way absorbed into the bloodstream, and is not a carcinogen. So much for the information of new sources of Toxicology.
In the toxicology is still important to understand the relationship between dose and effect, as new toxicologists do not understand, despite what they wrote about it before a lot of medieval scholars hundreds of years ago. Of course anything can be poison, including the clear spring water, but toxicology deals with dose where toxicity really start to happen and the harmful effects of dose on the basis of such substances are classified according to risk. Thus for inst.toxicologists salt did not classify as poisons, despite the serious poisonings recorded by this important chemical.
Any hazardous substance at certain small dose will not cause any harmful effects but only when it exceeds the specified limit risk. So we freely intake into the body by smoking cyanides, cyanides or biotransformation in the body resulting from amygdalin, which in turn we take through bitter almonds or apricot kernels. Of course we enjoy without consequence because there are toxic materials in doses well below those that may cause adverse effects first.
Our food is full of toxins, created naturally or by metabolism of bacterias and mold. While there is a low doses of these toxins, we must not overlook the fact what we eat. That does not mean that we should not care about the health safety of food or the cleanliness of the air we breathe, but it has nothing to do to health safety and toxicology( Not quite correct,TM).
Safety is, usually expressed with a maximum permissible concentration (MPC) or recommended concentrations, talking about safety and not on risk. Engineer Malacko question of who has set these limits, I am instructing her to first learn about the basic concepts and only after that public her opinion on the issues that troubles her.
Although I do not have enough space to explain, I must point out that the acceptable daily intake is calculated from which MDC or recommended concentration, calculated by dividing by a factor of safety (10-10000, depending on model and type of adverse effect) at the maximum dose that can not yet occur any more adverse effects.
 
Malacko engineer must also know that these values ​​are calculated the world's leading experts on the basis of experiments that are carried out simultaneously in several well-controlled laboratory with GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) certificates.
Do you really need to listen to ignorant people who appear like a false prophet, scaring the inhabitants by their ignorance? Everyone, of course, has the right to say whatever comes to mind him and so, for example, that the earth was flat, but one should also be publicly responded as the ignorant who write stupidities. "
The author is a university professor of toxicology, Director of the Institute of Toxicology, F. Plavsic


PS: MALACKO ENGINEER WORKED 15 YEARS WITH PESTICIDES SO KNOWS ALL ABOUT TOXICITY AND LD, THAT IS VISIBLE FROM ALL POSTED ARTICLES, BUT FUNNY, VJESNIK REJECTED TO PRINT HER DEFENSE!

INSULIN



This is the translation of the article published in NOVI LIST, Rijeka, Croatia
in September 2002, under the title:

" GM INSULIN WILL DO HARM TO THE HEALTH OF DIABETICS
 AND THERE WILL BE A DEATH CASES TOO"


that I sent to Mr. Prof. Dr. Arthur Teuscher from 
"Stiftung Erhnärung und Diabetes", who supplied some data for 
this article.

 

first article about GM insulin

TO: 1 recipient

Stiftung Ernährung und Diabetes

Dear Mr. Prof. Dr. Arthur Teuscher,
below please find the first printed article.



This is the first written article:


“GM insulin will do harm to the health of diabetics
and there will be a death cases  too ”


Reading the article “ Introduction of New Insulin” in
Novi List I worried about  the monopolization of our
insulin market from the side of Novo Nordisk.  Namely,
according writing Vecernji list ( other daily)  Novo
Nordisk held up to now 85 pct of our insulin market
and in the near future, if I have understood it well,
Novo Nordisk have to rule by our market totally.  But
other matter interested me more that I haven’t find it
in there: is this product genetically altered product
because, so far I know,  Novo Nordisk produces just
the product like that.  The case is familiar to me
from Canada( by the way Canada was the first one
to extract insulin in twenties last century). There,
1995. Novo Nordisk withdrew  the all animal insulin
from the market introducing genetically altered
insulin exclusively.  This product causes at the users
the reactions that can be lethal as well.  That bad
example followed Elly Lilly 1999. so now is happening
that in Canada people can get just  the “new” product,
it means genetically altered insulin.
Of course, the producer insists that the product is
safe but it’s not so.  In April 2000.  the class suit
was launched in New Mexico,USA against both companies
because putting on the market exclusively genetically
altered insulin that causes various reactions, some of
them lethal too.

The reactions are as follows:
 A survey carried out by the Trust in 1994 showed the following adverse effects to synthetic GM insulins:
  • loss of warnings of hypos
  • extreme tiredness or lethargy, sleeping all the time
  • large weight increase 28% - feeling unwell all the time
  • memory loss, confusion, mood swings, change in personality
  • erratic blood glucose levels
  • joint and muscle pains
When patients returned to animal insulin, these symptoms largely disappeared.





Majority of the users suffers from 3 or 4 symptoms at
the same time.  There were cases that the blood sugar
dropped drastically during driving the car and people
caused the accidents, some died...  The recommendation
is for using the animal insulin further specially for
THE CHILDREN.  Returning back to the animal insulin
the symptoms withdrawing,  if there weren’t the
hypoglycemic shock and brain damages occurred. 

Just the hypoglycemic shock took 8  human lives in Canada,
92 in the USA.  All people were using, proved, GM
insulin!  The reactions appeared at 465 people, in the
USA over 4,000.  This data are coming from “ Globe and
Mail” from 6. February this year(2002).  We can expect
that, in the meantime,  this numbers will just rase up. 
Canada established  The Committee for investigation
the cases and reactions to the GM insulin.  The
details about the class suit you can find at
cfuller@telus.net,  as well you can check all above
there.
(In the meantime, the class suit is rejected due to the lack of evidences!)

I worry about that up to 27,000 our citizens will
fight against the reactions, (because at least 20 pct of GM insulin
users are suffering from the above side effects, at least, some are suffering
on multiple side effects or all of them)
  that the insulin instead
of improving their health will do more harm to them,
and there will be the death cases as well.

Sadly but true how successful is that,  as  Dr. Jost
called it “ GM imperialism”. For inst. Novo Nordisk
bought the biggest producer of the animal insulin of
the south hemisphere Biobras just to withdrew the
product from the market in favor of GM insulin.
In the lightening of all above I am afraid that our
diabetics will find themselves in the bad position
therefore I am asking from the people in charge to
take care about.

This article IS NOT THE CALL TO STOP TAKING INSULIN,
just you have to know all facts TO CHOSE THE ONE THAT SUITS YOU THE BEST!


This article was used by Mrs.Jenny Hirst from IDDT International,UK,
as one of the elements for her giving statement in front of THE PARLIAMENTARY
COMMISSION OF CANADA about side effects of insulin, 2005.

Please find the report of Mrs.Jenny Hirst, IDDT International,UK below:




Registered Charity No: 1058284  Co. Reg. No: 3148360

A charity listening to those with diabetes and their carers and supporting their needs

Telephone: 01604 622837  e-mail enquiries@iddtintemational.org  website: www.iddtintemational.org
Fax. 01604 622838
P 0 Box 294, Northampton, NN1 4XS


________________________________________________________________



24th January 2005

For the attention of:

Dr. Pierre Charest
Director General
Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate
Health Canada



The Honorable Ujjal Dosanjh
Minister of Health and
Honorable Members of the Standing Committee on Health


Synthetic GM 'human' insulins and natural animal insulins in the UK



The Insulin Dependent Diabetes Trust is a registered charity based in the UK which  formed in 1994 to help and support people with diabetes and their families, especially those who suffer adverse effects as a result of using synthetic GM insulins. Membership of the Trust has grown with members in many countries throughout the world, largely as a result of the policy of systematic discontinuation of animal insulin by the major pharmaceutical companies in most countries, indicating that this issue is global and not restricted to any particular country. The Trust aims to help and support people who are unable to tolerate synthetic GM insulins, to seek recognition for the adverse effects caused by synthetic GM insulins and to campaign to maintain continued supplies of animal insulin.

Synthetic GM so-called 'human' insulin was introduced in the UK in 1982. Following the widespread belief, or rumour, that animal insulins were to be discontinued, by the mid to late 1980s, 84% of people requiring insulin had been transferred to GM 'human' insulin, often without their knowledge, consent or for any clinical reason. The British Diabetic Association, now Diabetes UK, received nearly 3,000 letters about adverse effects caused by this type of insulin. Many prescribing doctors prevented people from changing back to the animal insulin that had suited them better.



At that time the most common adverse effect was a loss of warnings of hypoglycaemia putting the patient at risk of unheralded hypoglycaemic attacks without the ability to take remedial action to prevent coma and even death. Since that time the range of adverse effects increased.



A survey carried out by the Trust in 1994 showed the following adverse effects to synthetic GM insulins:
  • loss of warnings of hypos
  • extreme tiredness or lethargy, sleeping all the time
  • large weight increase 28% - feeling unwell all the time
  • memory loss, confusion, mood swings, change in personality
  • erratic blood glucose levels
  • joint and muscle pains
When patients returned to animal insulin, these symptoms largely disappeared.

Patients were told that GM insulins would be cheaper, less immunogenic and better. There was never any evidence to support these statements and after 20years none of these statements have proved to be true. Indeed, it is surprising that GM insulins have become first line insulin treatment as they are significantly more expensive than animal insulins. The Trust gave evidence to the UK Health Select Committee Inquiry into the Influence of the pharmaceutical industry on health and pointed out that there was a significant waste of money to the National Health Service by the prescribing of GM insulins which no proven benefit for patients over less expensive animal insulins. [December 2004]






The evidence
A Cochrane Review [2002] comparing animal and 'human' insulin showed that 'human' insulin was not superior to animal insulin. More importantly, the Review also showed that the vast majority of the research was methodologically poor and no research had been carried out to compare mortality and complication rates using the two different types of insulin. Thus neither doctors nor patients have any evidence of long-term safety o GM insulins on which to base their treatment decisions.



The present position in the UK is that 30,000 people use animal insulin, about 10% of insulin users. However, this usage relies on patients finding out for themselves that animal insulins are available as the majority of doctors and diabetes educators do not give patients a choice of treatment which is theirs by right.



In the late 1990s insulin analogues were introduced, again on the basis that they were better than their predecessors but a second Cochrane Review [2004] compared GM 'human' insulin and short-acting insulin analogues. This review concluded that analogues are only slightly better in a minority of patients and again the research was methodologically poor and there is no evidence of their long-term safety. They have not been studied in people with diabetic complications, children or pregnant women because of concerns that insulin analogues have a greater potential for carcinogenic and mitogenic effects. It is of great concern to the Trust that patients are not informed of these risks, of the lack of research or of the lack of long-term safety data. Therefore their choice of insulin treatment is not an informed choice but one made on assumptions that insulin analogues are safe, and not on evidence of their safety.



It is for all these reasons that the Trust believes that animal insulins must remain available. If they are discontinued, people who have adverse effects to GM iinsulins will have no alternative treatment and will be condemned to a life of adverse effects. In addition, those people who do not wish to risk the possible development of cancers in the future, will not have an alternative treatment.



Lobbying Government
The Trust and its members have raised all these matters with their Members of Parliament and over 30 Parliamentary Questions have been asked by concerned MPs. The Trust has also met with The Minister of Health with responsibility for diabetes and her advisors.



To date we have established the following:
  • Novo Nordisk, one of the manufacturers of GM 'human' and analogue insulins, has acknowledged that there are people who are unable to tolerate 'human' insulins.



  • the Department of Health has acknowledged that analogue insulins do have the potential for carcinogenic effects and that GM 'human' insulins also have this potential but to a lesser degree than the analogues. It has also been  acknowledged that the epidemiological evidence gathered over 75 years does not suggest that such risks occur with natural animal insulins.



  • The Department of Health has agreed that patients should be given an informed choice of treatment including the choice of animal insulin.



  • The Department of Health has agreed that doctors and diabetes educators should be made more aware that animal insulins are available as a choice of treatment available to patients and arrangements are being made to provide all this information on the Department's website.



Patients' requests of Government
The Trust is continuing to campaign to ensure that insulin treatment is safe and effective for both short and long-term use and that the choice of treatment is available to patients. Therefore we are asking Government to:
  • instigate independent, high quality, long-term research into the safety of GM 'human' and analogue insulins is carried out to ensure that these insulins are safe for long-term use for all categories of people with requiring insulin treatment.



  • ensure that animal insulins remain available indefinitely for people who are unable to tolerate GM insulins and as a treatment option for those who have justifiable concerns about the carcinogenic and mitogenic risks associated with insulin analogues.



  • while recognising that Government cannot interfere with the commercial decisions of pharmaceutical companies, Government is responsible for the health of British citizens and we are asking them to ensure that alternative sources of animal insulins are sought in the event that Novo Nordisk decide to discontinue availability of animal insulin in the summer of 2005, their stated time for the final decision.






Jenny Hirst
Founder and Co-Chairman
Insulin Dependent Diabetes Trust





Please, compare the evidences from the book

Mr. Dr.John Virapen": Side effect: Death"